An example of being exposed to the Gay Agenda:

I was driving down the street one day in Ogden, Utah when I was passed by a big SUV that had writing all over the back of it.  It said: Lesbians Rule then had a big picture of a penis and ball sack drawn with a circle and slash though it and the word “bad” written next to it.  On the other side of the back of the car there was a flowery vagina drawn and the worlds “good” and “yum” written next to them. 

 

How many heterosexual people go driving around with a picture of a man and woman “doing it” on the back of the car?  Or a picture of a penis (a + sign) and a picture of a vagina followed by and (a = sign) then some little kids? 

Why don’t gay people just keep it to them selves?  We do I have to be exposed to their way of thinking?  Why do I have to see their obscenity as they are driving down the road?  If I did that to my car, I would probably be pulled over and cited for it.  Yet it is tolerable and acceptable for gay people to do it, it is an expression of who they are.  And that way everyone gets to be part of the obscenity.

 

I think it is wrong.

 

I have no problem with you being gay, God bless you for it.  But I do have rights, and with those rights, I choose to believe it is immoral and degrading to society.  I also believe I have a right to not have to be exposed to it. 

What could a 2nd Bill of Rights mean for you, me, and gays?

The issue of gay indoctrination makes me think about the NEW 2^ND BILL OF RIGHTS that is going to be pushed through the house and senate if the Dems win all 3 houses. 

 

Barack Obama said: The constitution tells you what the government can’t do to you, but it does not say what it has to do for you.  Will our 2^nd Bill of Rights tell us that the Government must provide us a home?  That they must provide us with health care?  That they must provide us with “sex” education?

 

What is stopping the “government” from saying it has to provide you with sex education and that education has to be fair?  You know if the government does anything, it has to be across the board equal.   So, if you have to learn about boys and girls having sex and reproducing as God and nature intended, you would be required to learn the inverse about boys and girls having sex and God and nature had not intended.    

It’s the same with science and how the earth and planets were created.  Except that it is no longer what God did, rather what someone conjured up as an idea of how it all happened. 

 

Sex will be taught to our children in public schools (as early as kindergarten) so there will be tolerance and fairness.  Our kids will not be taught that there are natural laws that bind men to women and not men to men or women to women. In stead they will be taught to swing with ever way they feel or express an interest.  They will be no moral foundation, no religious foundation, just indiscriminate sex with whomever you please.  But wrap it up if you please.   (I thought I would throw in a rhyme)

 

This is the worst thing that could happen to us as a country or society.  We will see the disintegration of our society of such a thing happens.  There should be NO 2^nd Bill of Rights, nor should the government and schools get into educating our children about gay lesbian, transgender or bisexual education, practices, any anything of the sort. 

 

Do not take away the rights of the many in order to please a few. 

Has Gay Advocacy gone too far? Where will it stop?

I read a story on  http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,445865,00.html Foxnews.com about a kindergarten class being required to sign “Gay Pledge Cards” in support of gay advocacy.  I was pleased the article stated that kindergarten students are likely not aware of what it means to be gay and that such items should be age appropriate.  I was also pleased that the administration was taking some sort of action, unlike the students who went on a field trip to the gay wedding ceremony.

 

I can understand the “gay” side of the issue.  They don’t want like kids calling each other “gay” or “queer” or anything of the sort because it hurts someone’s feelings.  Come on, they are kids.  At that age, they don’t even understand what they are saying.   Tell them it is a word they shouldn’t use, but don’t indoctrinate them into determining their sexuality at that age.  I would think anyone who is gay had thick enough skin to not worry about what a kindergartener calls them or someone else.

 

Now, should people call gay people names?  No, that isn’t right either.  Should it be tolerated, that depends on what degree of not tolerated you mean.  Punishable by death for calling someone  name?  No.  Incarcerated?  No.  Told that is something they shouldn’t do?  Yes.   

 

But again, where do you draw the line between this is right and this is wrong?  Where do you draw the line between you have a right to be what you want to be and I have a right to learn about what I want to learn about?  Or think and say the things I want to think and say?  Where do you draw the line between what my rights are as a human being, my rights as an American, and my rights established by the Bill of Rights and constitution of the United States of America?

 

The major problem with gay advocacy is that it takes away the rights of others.  People should be sympathetic of all people and their rights to believe the way they do, but in the name of tolerance and fairness the rights of others are being trampled upon.  We the people are being forced to accept something many of us have no desire to accept.  We are being forced to hear and learn about something we have no desire to hear or learn about.  And where is the line going to be drawn?

 

Parents have the right to decide whether or not their child is exposed to anything related to being gay and even more so, have the right to control whether their children are indoctrinated by the gay agenda. 

 

To some people being “gay” is fundamentally wrong.  It does not make sense in any way shape or form.   It is fundamentally contrary to the design and nature human beings.  This platform has a MAJOR moral contradiction to it.  Why should people who see and understand the moral and natural contradiction be forced to accept it. 

 

With that said, a kindergartener is in no position to know or understand this issue.  At that age it should be determined by the parents what is appropriate to be taught and what is not… especially in issues that have the potential to be so fundamentally and morally wrong to people.